Home >

news ヘルプ

論文・著書情報


タイトル
和文: 
英文:Drug-target affinity prediction using applicability domain based on data density 
著者
和文: 杉田 駿也, 大上 雅史.  
英文: Shunya Sugita, Masahito Ohue.  
言語 English 
掲載誌/書名
和文: 
英文:In Proceedings of The 18th IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB 2021) 
巻, 号, ページ         Page 1-6
出版年月 2021年10月18日 
出版者
和文: 
英文:IEEE 
会議名称
和文: 
英文:18th IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology(IEEE CIBCB2021) 
開催地
和文: 
英文: 
公式リンク https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9562808
 
DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/CIBCB49929.2021.9562808
アブストラクト In the pursuit of research and development of drug discovery, the computational prediction of the target affinity of a drug candidate is useful for screening compounds at an early stage and for verifying the binding potential to an unknown target. The chemogenomics-based method has attracted increased attention as it integrates information pertaining to the drug and target to predict drug-target affinity (DTA). However, the compound and target spaces are vast, and without sufficient training data, proper DTA prediction is not possible. If a DTA prediction is made in this situation, it will potentially lead to false predictions. In this study, we propose a DTA prediction method that can advise whether/when there are insufficient samples in the compound/target spaces based on the concept of the applicability domain (AD) and the data density of the training dataset. AD indicates a data region in which a machine learning model can make reliable predictions. By preclassifying the samples to be predicted by the constructed AD into those within (In-AD) and those outside the AD (Out-AD), we can determine whether a reasonable prediction can be made for these samples. The results of the evaluation experiments based on the use of three different public datasets showed that the AD constructed by the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method worked well, i.e., the prediction accuracy of the samples classified by the AD as Out-AD was low, while the prediction accuracy of the samples classified by the AD as In-AD was high.

©2007 Institute of Science Tokyo All rights reserved.